Sunday October 25, 2020

Nama official misled court by accident

Nama asked for review of earlier judgment after staffer suffered ‘reputational damage’

31st January, 2016
NAMA head offices Picture: Bloomberg

Judge Brian Cregan has reiterated in a new judgment involving developer Garrett Kelleher that a senior official gave a “misleading impression” about Nama’s interactions with the developer to the High Court.

He accepted that the official did not mean to mislead.

Judge Cregan had said in an earlier conclusion judgment last December that Nama’s Peter Malbasha, an asset recovery manager, was “not only incorrect but positively misleading”.

Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!

Exclusive offers:

All Digital Access + eReader



Unlimited Access for 1 Month

Then €19.99 a month after the offer period.

Get basic
*New subscribers only
You can cancel any time.



€149 For the 1st Year

Unlimited Access for 1 Year

You can cancel any time.




90 Day Pass

You can cancel any time.

2 Yearly



Unlimited Access for 2 Years

This product does not auto-renew

Team Pass

Get a Business Account for you and your team

Related Stories

The state’s National Cyber Security Centre is constantly dealing with suspected attacks and urgently needs more resources

Michael Brennan | 1 month ago

We are far less reliant on the UK as a trading partner now than in previous decades — our focus needs to switch to the many challenges and opportunities of the future

Neale Richmond | 1 month ago

Covid-19 and an economic crisis are exacerbating the trauma of this month’s explosion, writes a Concern worker on the ground

Dom Hunt | 2 months ago