Wednesday April 1, 2020

Zoe Group to claim evidence was ignored

Liam Carroll’s Zoe Group will this week argue that the High Court ‘‘erred in both fact and in law’’, and did not sufficiently consider crucial economic evidence when it refused to appoint an examiner to the group.

19th September, 2009

Liam Carroll’s Zoe Group will this week argue that the High Court ‘‘erred in both fact and in law’’, and did not sufficiently consider crucial economic evidence when it refused to appoint an examiner to the group.

Ahead of an unprecedented second Supreme Court challenge this week, pleadings submitted by Carroll’s legal team outline the strategy and the arguments that will be made by the Zoe Group during the...

Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!

Exclusive offers:

All Digital Access + eReader

Trial

€1

Unlimited Access for 1 Month

Then €19.99 a month after the offer period.

Get basic
*New subscribers only
You can cancel any time.

Annual

€200

€149 For the 1st Year

Unlimited Access for 1 Year

You can cancel any time.

Quarterly

€55

€42

90 Day Pass

You can cancel any time.

Team Pass

Get a Business Account for you and your team

Share this post

Related Stories

The best writing and and the biggest stories of 2019 from the Business Post

Richie Oakley | 3 months ago

Denis O’Brien is back in court, residents continue to fight the Council on halting site and a row surfaces in government over rent control proposals

Leanna Byrne | 4 years ago