When can tweets, blogs and other online ramblings prejudice an ongoing court case? Can they ever amount to prejudicial publicity?
And how easily will an Irish court abandon a prosecution because of such online prejudice?
All three questions have been addressed in a High Court judgment delivered earlier this month. In Niall Byrne and the DPP, Judge Peter Charleton refused an appeal by a man who claimed that online articles and internet commentary were likely...
Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!
With any subscription you will have access to
Unlimited multi-device access to our iPad, iPhone and Android Apps
Unlimited access to our eReader library
Exclusive daily insight and opinion seven days a week
Create alerts to never miss a subject that matters to you
Get access to exclusive offers for subscribers on gifts and experiences
Get content from Business Post, Business Post Magazines, Connected, Tatler and Food & Wine