Sunday November 29, 2020

Government referendum spending not impartial, court rules

The Supreme Court has ruled that public money was not spent in a “fair, equal or impartial” way on publicity relating to Saturday’s upcoming referendum.

8th November, 2012
2
The Supreme Court said it was neither appropriate nor necessary to grant an injunction.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Minister for Children, the government and the Attorney General did not act in a “fair, equal or impartial” way in spending public money on a publicity relating to Saturday’s referendum on the Thirty First Amendment of the Constitution (Children) Bill, 2012.

But the court said it was neither appropriate nor necessary to grant an injunction, as it assumed that the government would stop distributing and...

Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!

Exclusive offers:

All Digital Access + eReader

Trial

€1

Unlimited Access for 1 Month

Then €19.99 a month after the offer period.

Get basic
*New subscribers only
You can cancel any time.

Annual

€200

€149 For the 1st Year

Unlimited Access for 1 Year

You can cancel any time.

Quarterly

€55

€42

90 Day Pass

You can cancel any time.

2 Yearly

€315

€248

Unlimited Access for 2 Years

This product does not auto-renew

Team Pass

Get a Business Account for you and your team

Share this post

Related Stories

The best writing and and the biggest stories of 2019 from the Business Post

Richie Oakley | 11 months ago

Denis O’Brien is back in court, residents continue to fight the Council on halting site and a row surfaces in government over rent control proposals

Leanna Byrne | 5 years ago