Thursday July 9, 2020

No such thing as ‘absolute confidence’ in courts

In calling for such an impossible standard of certainty in cervical screening, the judiciary are asking something of doctors that members of the legal profession wouldn’t dream of achieving in the performance of their duties

16th June, 2019

Judges always sound confident in their judgments. I imagine you don’t get to be a judge unless you’re a very confident person.

But judgments in civil law are like many medical decisions: they are based on the balance of probabilities. As such, they can be wrong. Having absolute confidence in anything is an ideal. It doesn’t appear on any consent forms for medical treatments or tests. Doctors don’t use words like...

Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!

Exclusive offers:

All Digital Access + eReader

Trial

€1

Unlimited Access for 1 Month

Then €19.99 a month after the offer period.

Get basic
*New subscribers only
You can cancel any time.

Annual

€200

€149 For the 1st Year

Unlimited Access for 1 Year

You can cancel any time.

Quarterly

€55

€42

90 Day Pass

You can cancel any time.

Team Pass

Get a Business Account for you and your team

Related Stories

Many of us have achieved a new life balance that might just be the real ‘new normal’

Sharyn McAndrew | 1 month ago

Property firms such as QRE are dealing with the coronavirus lockdown by trying to maintain some normality in their day-to-day business

Conor Whelan | 1 month ago

Hardline opposition to EU solidarity in funding the cost of Covid-19 is driven by German allergy to ‘imprudent’ spending, and by Dutch politicians fearing the transfer of funds to southern countries would provoke a far-right backlash

Barry J Whyte | 2 months ago