There’s no need to panic over cervical screening judgment

The British precedent for the finding in the Ruth Morrissey case has caused no flood of litigation in that jurisdiction

19th May, 2019

Anxiety among medics in the wake of the Morrissey judgment on cervical screening is to be expected. Hysteria not so much.

In his judgment, Mr Justice Kevin Cross adopted a 20-year-old British decision, Penney and Ors v East Kent Health Authority, which set “absolute confidence” as the standard of care to be applied for reading cervical smear slides.

The terminology is scary enough to send a shiver down any professional’s spine, but the...

Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!


What's Included

With any subscription you will have access to

  • 971569B3-2C5E-4C45-B798-CEADE16987A8

    Unlimited multi-device access to our iPad, iPhone and Android Apps

  • 099C8662-C57C-42F2-9426-F2F90DF17C8F

    Unlimited access to our eReader library

  • 198AE43B-B9CF-4892-8769-D63C2104BA08

    Exclusive daily insight and opinion seven days a week

  • D8F37B78-25E4-4E4A-A376-4F5789B1564A

    Create alerts to never miss a subject that matters to you

  • B15F2521-37CD-4E02-B898-730A20D39F7F

    Get access to exclusive offers for subscribers on gifts and experiences

  • A564FE02-1AB8-4579-AF9D-BA32A2E5ACA7

    Get content from Business Post, Business Post Magazines, Connected, Tatler and Food & Wine

Share this post

Related Stories

HSE never used Citywest conference centre as isolation hub despite multimillion refurbishment

Róisin Shortall: Lack of political will is derailing Sláintecare’s health reforms

HSE resistance to reform led to Sláintecare resignations

Health Daniel Murray 5 days ago

Elaine Byrne: Our conservative approach to medical cannabis is prolonging people’s suffering

Health Elaine Byrne 5 days ago